[Erp5-dev] Sale Invoice Transaction - different behavoiur

[Łukasz Nowak]

Hello,

On 2007-09-13, 14:28:45
Łukasz Nowak <lukasz.nowak at ventis.com.pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Here's my scenario:
> 
> SIT-1 generated by by SPL-1, which has SPLL with resource R, price 10,
> quantity 20
> 
> SIT-2 made by hand, which has SIT-IL with resource R, price 10,
> quantity 20
> 
> SIT-1 and SIT-2 is in planned state.
> 
> I've got properly configured Invoice Transaction Rule - so after
> expanding SIT-1 and SIT-2 I've got nice simulations related to
> accounts
> - to generate ATL after confirming invoice.
> 
> 1) Changing quantity/price on SIT1-IL do not change related simulation
> movements, which applied rule is Invoice Transaction Rule.
> 
> 2) Changing quantity/price on SIT2-IL (those w/o causality) change
> related simulation movements, which applied rule is Invoice
> Transaction Rule.
> 
> So in 1) after confirming I've got "improper" values of ATL, in case
> 2) everything is ok.
> 
> I thought that in both scenarios behaviour of system will be the same.
> Before digging more into it I'd like to know, what is wrong? Is it
> bug, feature, it comes from idea, or something? I'll try to find out
> "where" above difference in code has a place, but tip about it would
> be great.
> 
> Legend:
>   ATL - Accounting Transaction Line
>   SIT - Sale Invoice Transaction
>   SIT[n]-IL - Invoice [n] Line
>   SPL - Sale Packing List
>   SPLL - Sale Packing List Line

Small addition - I've played more with this issue, and what I've
observed that no simulations are updated when Purchase/Sale Invoice
Transaction are based on Purchase/Sale Packing Lists.

properties used: start/stop date of invoice, quantity, price of invoice
lines.

I'll try to figure out more and share with experience.

Regards,
Luke

-- 
Łukasz Nowak R&D Ventis http://www.ventis.com.pl/
tel: +48 32 768 16 85 fax: +48 32 392 10 61
``Use the Source, Luke...''