[Neo-report] r2763 jm - in /trunk/neo: client/ client/handlers/ tests/client/

[nobody at svn.erp5.org]

Author: jm
Date: Fri May 27 18:53:27 2011
New Revision: 2763

Log:
Update implementation of HasLock processing on client side

Modified:
    trunk/neo/client/app.py
    trunk/neo/client/handlers/storage.py
    trunk/neo/tests/client/testStorageHandler.py

Modified: trunk/neo/client/app.py
==============================================================================
--- trunk/neo/client/app.py [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/neo/client/app.py [iso-8859-1] Fri May 27 18:53:27 2011
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ class Application(object):
                 else:
                     compression = 1
         checksum = makeChecksum(compressed_data)
-        on_timeout = OnTimeout(self.onStoreTimeout, ttid, oid)
+        on_timeout = OnTimeout(self.onStoreTimeout, txn_context, oid)
         # Store object in tmp cache
         data_dict = txn_context['data_dict']
         if oid not in data_dict:
@@ -555,15 +555,15 @@ class Application(object):
 
         self._waitAnyTransactionMessage(txn_context, False)
 
-    def onStoreTimeout(self, conn, msg_id, ttid, oid):
+    def onStoreTimeout(self, conn, msg_id, txn_context, oid):
         # NOTE: this method is called from poll thread, don't use
-        # thread-specific value !
-        # Stop expecting the timed-out store request.
-        queue = self.dispatcher.forget(conn, msg_id)
+        #       thread-specific value !
+        txn_context.setdefault('timeout_dict', {})[oid] = msg_id
         # Ask the storage if someone locks the object.
-        # Shorten timeout to react earlier to an unresponding storage.
-        conn.ask(Packets.AskHasLock(ttid, oid), timeout=5, queue=queue)
-        return True
+        # By sending a message with a smaller timeout,
+        # the connection will be kept open.
+        conn.ask(Packets.AskHasLock(txn_context['ttid'], oid),
+                 timeout=5, queue=txn_context['queue'])
 
     @profiler_decorator
     def _handleConflicts(self, txn_context, tryToResolveConflict):

Modified: trunk/neo/client/handlers/storage.py
==============================================================================
--- trunk/neo/client/handlers/storage.py [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/neo/client/handlers/storage.py [iso-8859-1] Fri May 27 18:53:27 2011
@@ -141,21 +141,32 @@ class StorageAnswersHandler(AnswerBaseHa
         self.app.getHandlerData().update(object_tid_dict)
 
     def answerHasLock(self, conn, oid, status):
+        store_msg_id = self.app.getHandlerData()['timeout_dict'].pop(oid)
         if status == LockState.GRANTED_TO_OTHER:
+            # Stop expecting the timed-out store request.
+            self.app.dispatcher.forget(conn, store_msg_id)
             # Object is locked by another transaction, and we have waited until
             # timeout. To avoid a deadlock, abort current transaction (we might
             # be locking objects the other transaction is waiting for).
             raise ConflictError, 'Lock wait timeout for oid %s on %r' % (
                 dump(oid), conn)
-        elif status == LockState.GRANTED:
-            neo.lib.logging.info('Store of oid %s was successful, but after ' \
-                'timeout.', dump(oid))
-            # XXX: Not sure what to do in this case yet, for now do nothing.
-        else:
-            # Nobody has the lock, although we asked storage to lock. This
-            # means there is a software bug somewhere.
-            # XXX: Not sure what to do in this case yet
-            raise NotImplementedError
+        # HasLock design required that storage is multi-threaded so that
+        # it can answer to AskHasLock while processing store resquests.
+        # This means that the 2 cases (granted to us or nobody) are legitimate,
+        # either because it gave us the lock but is/was slow to store our data,
+        # or because the storage took a lot of time processing a previous
+        # store (and did not even considered our lock request).
+        # XXX: But storage nodes are still mono-threaded, so they should
+        #      only answer with GRANTED_TO_OTHER (if they reply!), except
+        #      maybe in very rare cases of race condition. Only log for now.
+        #      This also means that most of the time, if the storage is slow
+        #      to process some store requests, HasLock will timeout in turn
+        #      and the connector will be closed.
+        #      Anyway, it's not clear that HasLock requests are useful.
+        #      Are store requests potentially long to process ? If not,
+        #      we should simply raise a ConflictError on store timeout.
+        neo.lib.logging.info('Store of oid %s delayed (storage overload ?)',
+                             dump(oid))
 
     def alreadyPendingError(self, conn, message):
         pass

Modified: trunk/neo/tests/client/testStorageHandler.py
==============================================================================
--- trunk/neo/tests/client/testStorageHandler.py [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/neo/tests/client/testStorageHandler.py [iso-8859-1] Fri May 27 18:53:27 2011
@@ -269,17 +269,6 @@ class StorageAnswerHandlerTests(NeoUnitT
             oid2: [tid2, tid3],
         })
 
-    def test_answerHasLock(self):
-        uuid = self.getNewUUID()
-        conn = self.getFakeConnection(uuid=uuid)
-        oid = self.getOID(0)
-
-        self.assertRaises(ConflictError, self.handler.answerHasLock, conn, oid,
-            LockState.GRANTED_TO_OTHER)
-        # XXX: Just check that this doesn't raise for the moment.
-        self.handler.answerHasLock(conn, oid, LockState.GRANTED)
-        # TODO: Test LockState.NOT_LOCKED case when implemented.
-
 if __name__ == '__main__':
     unittest.main()