[Erp5-report] r32928 kazuhiko - /erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py
nobody at svn.erp5.org
nobody at svn.erp5.org
Mon Feb 22 11:22:07 CET 2010
Author: kazuhiko
Date: Mon Feb 22 11:22:06 2010
New Revision: 32928
URL: http://svn.erp5.org?rev=32928&view=rev
Log:
just cleanup of the file.
Modified:
erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py
Modified: erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py
URL: http://svn.erp5.org/erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py?rev=32928&r1=32927&r2=32928&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py [utf8] (original)
+++ erp5/trunk/products/ERP5/tests/testAccountingRules.py [utf8] Mon Feb 22 11:22:06 2010
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
##############################################################################
#
-# Copyright (c) 2004 Nexedi SARL and Contributors. All Rights Reserved.
+# Copyright (c) 2010 Nexedi SA and Contributors. All Rights Reserved.
# Sebastien Robin <seb at nexedi.com>
-# Jerome Perrin <jerome at nexedi.com>
+# Jerome Perrin <jerome at nexedi.com>
#
# WARNING: This program as such is intended to be used by professional
# programmers who take the whole responsability of assessing all potential
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
#
##############################################################################
"""
@@ -32,12 +32,12 @@
way it is used in the invoice related simulation.
"""
-# TODO :
+# TODO :
# * test with a Person as destination_section
# * test cancelling / deleting an invoice
# * test payment rule & payment builder
# * test simulation purge when Payment delivered or top level Order cancelled
-# * test removing cells for a line
+# * test removing cells for a line
#
import unittest
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
from Products.ERP5Type.tests.Sequence import SequenceList
from Testing import ZopeTestCase
-from AccessControl.SecurityManagement import newSecurityManager
from zLOG import LOG, INFO
from DateTime import DateTime
@@ -70,7 +69,7 @@
class TestAccountingRulesMixin:
- # define portal_types
+ # define portal_types
account_module_portal_type = "Account Module"
accounting_module_portal_type = "Accounting Module"
product_module_portal_type = "Product Module"
@@ -85,7 +84,7 @@
accounting_rule_cell_portal_type = "Accounting Rule Cell"
invoice_transaction_rule_portal_type \
= "Invoice Transaction Rule"
-
+
payment_transaction_portal_type = "Payment Transaction"
def getBusinessTemplateList(self):
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@
def getAccountModule(self):
return getattr(self.getPortal(), 'account',
getattr(self.getPortal(), 'account_module'))
-
+
def getAccountingModule(self):
return getattr(self.getPortal(), 'accounting',
getattr(self.getPortal(), 'accounting_module'))
@@ -104,14 +103,14 @@
def getProductModule(self):
return getattr(self.getPortal(), 'product',
getattr(self.getPortal(), 'product_module'))
-
+
## XXX move this to "Sequence class"
def playSequence(self, sequence_string, quiet=0) :
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_list.addSequenceString(sequence_string)
sequence_list.play(self, quiet=quiet)
-
+
class TestAccountingRules(TestAccountingRulesMixin, ERP5TypeTestCase):
"""
This should test the simulation tree and builds starting from the
@@ -119,16 +118,16 @@
"""
RUN_ALL_TESTS = 1
- QUIET = 1
-
+ QUIET = 0
+
def getTitle(self):
return "Accounting Rules"
-
+
def afterSetUp(self) :
self.login()
self.createCategories()
self.validateRules()
-
+
def createCategories(self) :
""" create all categories that are needed for this test.
It uses getCategoriesToCreate, so you should overload this method.
@@ -155,7 +154,7 @@
self.assertNotEquals(None,
self.getCategoryTool().restrictedTraverse(cat_string),
cat_string)
-
+
def getBaseCategoriesToCreate(self) :
return ("hd_size", "cpu_freq")
@@ -164,9 +163,9 @@
# regions for our organisations
"region/europe/west/france",
"region/africa",
-
+
# those are mandatory for account, and accounting rules depends on
- # the account_type category. (ie payable, will create a Payment
+ # the account_type category. (ie payable, will create a Payment
# Transaction accordingly)
"account_type/asset/cash",
"account_type/asset/receivable/refundable_vat",
@@ -174,13 +173,13 @@
"account_type/expense",
"account_type/income",
"account_type/liability/payable/collected_vat",
-
+
# some products lines for our products
"product_line/storever/notebook",
"product_line/storever/barebone",
"product_line/storever/openbrick",
"product_line/not_used/not_matched",
-
+
# some categories for variating our products
"cpu_freq/1Ghz",
"cpu_freq/2Ghz",
@@ -189,7 +188,7 @@
)
def stepCreateInvoiceTransactionRule(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """
+ """
Create some predicates in the Invoice Transaction Rule
"""
invoice_transaction_rule = getattr(self.getRuleTool(),
@@ -260,18 +259,18 @@
predicate_region_france = predicate_region_france,
predicate_region_africa = predicate_region_africa,
)
-
+
def stepUpdateInvoiceTransactionRuleMatrix(self, sequence, **kw) :
"""Creates/updates the matrix of the sale invoice transaction rule """
invoice_transaction_rule = sequence.get('invoice_transaction_rule')
base_id = 'movement'
kwd = {'base_id': base_id}
-
+
# update the matrix, generates the accounting rule cells
invoice_transaction_rule.edit()
invoice_transaction_rule.updateMatrix()
self.tic()
-
+
# check the accounting rule cells inside the matrix
cell_list = invoice_transaction_rule.contentValues(
filter = {'portal_type':self.accounting_rule_cell_portal_type})
@@ -287,7 +286,7 @@
'%s_1_0'%base_id, None)
product_barebone_region_africa_cell = getattr(invoice_transaction_rule,
'%s_1_1'%base_id, None)
-
+
self.failUnless(product_notebook_region_france_cell != None)
self.failUnless(product_notebook_region_africa_cell != None)
self.failUnless(product_barebone_region_france_cell != None)
@@ -299,7 +298,7 @@
product_barebone_region_france_cell = product_barebone_region_france_cell,
product_barebone_region_africa_cell = product_barebone_region_africa_cell,
)
-
+
def stepValidateInvoiceTransaction(self, sequence, **kw) :
"""validates the sale invoice transaction rule"""
sequence.get('invoice_transaction_rule').validate()
@@ -333,9 +332,9 @@
product_notebook_region_france_cell_vat =
product_notebook_region_france_cell_vat,
)
-
+
def stepCreateBareboneFranceCell(self, sequence, **kw):
- """ creates the content of product_barebone_region_france_cell,
+ """ creates the content of product_barebone_region_france_cell,
the same as product_notebook_region_france_cell, but the income
account is differrent """
# create content in the notebook / france cell
@@ -365,8 +364,8 @@
product_barebone_region_france_cell_receivable =\
product_barebone_region_france_cell_receivable
)
-
-
+
+
def stepCreateAccounts(self, sequence, **kw):
"""
Create an income, an payable and a collected_vat account
@@ -405,7 +404,7 @@
receivable = account_module.receivable,
collected_vat = account_module.collected_vat,
)
-
+
def stepCreateEntities(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" Create a vendor and a client organisation.
The region of the client is the same as the region
@@ -432,10 +431,10 @@
client_fr = organisation_module.client_fr,
client = organisation_module.client_fr,
)
-
+
def stepCreateProducts(self, sequence, **kw) :
"""
- Create 2 kind of products, a notebook (Varianted)
+ Create 2 kind of products, a notebook (Varianted)
and a barebone not varianted.
"""
product_module = self.getProductModule()
@@ -455,7 +454,7 @@
"cpu_freq/2Ghz",
"hd_size/60Go",
"hd_size/120Go",])
-
+
barebone = product_module.newContent(
id = 'barebone',
title = 'Barebone',
@@ -469,7 +468,7 @@
product_notebook = product_module.notebook,
product_barebone = product_module.barebone,
)
-
+
def stepCreateCurrencies(self, sequence, **kw) :
"""
Create EUR currency
@@ -483,18 +482,18 @@
base_unit_quantity = .01,
)
sequence.edit(euro=currency_module.EUR, currency=currency_module.EUR)
-
+
def stepCreatePaymentRule(self, **kw) :
""" create a rule payment transaction generation """
# XXX: for now there are no cells in payment rule, so nothing to do here
# TODO
-
+
def stepCreateEmptyInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" Create an empty invoice that will be modified later """
vendor = sequence.get('vendor')
client = sequence.get('client')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
empty_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'empty_invoice',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -505,16 +504,16 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
sequence.edit(
simple_invoice = empty_invoice,
invoice = empty_invoice,
)
-
+
def stepCreateSimpleInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" creates a simple sale invoice for non varianted notebook product.
The invoice is from `vendor` to `client_fr`, so the cell defined in
- stepUpdateInvoiceTransactionRuleMatrix should match.
+ stepUpdateInvoiceTransactionRuleMatrix should match.
This invoice containts one line, 10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price
is 100
"""
@@ -522,7 +521,7 @@
client = sequence.get('client')
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
simple_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'simple_invoice',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -534,7 +533,7 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
invoice_line = simple_invoice.newContent(
id = 'invoice_line',
resource = product_notebook.getRelativeUrl(),
@@ -543,14 +542,14 @@
portal_type = self.invoice_line_portal_type)
self.assertEqual(invoice_line.getTotalPrice(), 100)
-
+
sequence.edit(
simple_invoice = simple_invoice,
invoice = simple_invoice,
invoice_line = invoice_line,
invoice_lines = [invoice_line]
)
-
+
def stepCreateOtherSimpleInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" creates a simple sale invoice for non varianted notebook product.
It will contain one line that will later be changed.
@@ -559,7 +558,7 @@
client = sequence.get('client')
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
simple_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'other_simple_invoice',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -570,7 +569,7 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
invoice_line = simple_invoice.newContent(
id = 'invoice_line',
resource = product_notebook.getRelativeUrl(),
@@ -586,12 +585,12 @@
)
def stepAddInvoiceLine(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ add an invoice line in the current invoice :
+ """ add an invoice line in the current invoice :
10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price is 100
"""
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
-
+
invoice_line = invoice.newContent(
id = 'invoice_line_%s'%(int(random.random()*1000)),
portal_type = self.invoice_line_portal_type)
@@ -601,16 +600,16 @@
quantity = 10,
price = 10
)
-
+
self.assertEqual(invoice_line.getTotalPrice(), 100)
-
+
sequence.edit(
invoice_line = invoice_line,
invoice_lines = [invoice_line]
)
def stepEditInvoiceLine(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ edit the invoice line :
+ """ edit the invoice line :
10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price is 100
"""
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
@@ -618,10 +617,10 @@
invoice_line.edit(
quantity = 10,
price = 10)
-
+
self.assertEqual(invoice_line.getTotalPrice(), 100)
-
+
def stepDeleteInvoiceLine(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" remove an invoice line from the invoice
"""
@@ -629,7 +628,7 @@
invoice_line = sequence.get('invoice_line')
invoice._delObject(invoice_line.getId())
invoice.recursiveReindexObject()
-
+
def stepUpdateAppliedRule(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" update the applied rule for the invoice. In the UI, the call to
updateAppliedRule is made in an interraction workflow when you edit
@@ -638,10 +637,10 @@
# on the invoice (but this is not necessary)
invoice=sequence.get('invoice')
invoice.edit()
-
+
def stepCreateSimpleInvoiceTwoLines(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """
- similar to stepCreateSimpleInvoice, but replace
+ """
+ similar to stepCreateSimpleInvoice, but replace
"10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price is 100" by :
"5 notebook * 10 EUR + 5 notebook * 10 EUR , so total price is 100"
"""
@@ -649,7 +648,7 @@
client = sequence.get('client')
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
simple_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'simple_invoice_two_lines',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -660,7 +659,7 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
invoice_line1 = simple_invoice.newContent(
id = 'invoice_line1',
resource = product_notebook.getRelativeUrl(),
@@ -676,7 +675,7 @@
self.assertEqual(invoice_line1.getTotalPrice()
+ invoice_line2.getTotalPrice(), 100)
-
+
sequence.edit(
simple_invoice = simple_invoice,
invoice = simple_invoice,
@@ -684,15 +683,15 @@
)
def stepCreateSimpleInvoiceTwoCells(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """
+ """
similar to stepCreateSimpleInvoiceTwoLines, but use two
- differents cells on the same line instead of two differents lines.
+ differents cells on the same line instead of two differents lines.
"""
vendor = sequence.get('vendor')
client = sequence.get('client')
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
simple_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'simple_invoice_two_cells',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -703,12 +702,12 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
invoice_line = simple_invoice.newContent(
id = 'invoice_line',
resource = product_notebook.getRelativeUrl(),
portal_type = self.invoice_line_portal_type)
-
+
sequence.edit(
simple_invoice = simple_invoice,
invoice = simple_invoice,
@@ -721,7 +720,7 @@
""" add 2 cells in the invoice line, same quantity as simple invoice
"""
invoice_line = sequence.get('invoice_line')
-
+
# initialy, the line must not contain cells
self.assertEqual(len(invoice_line.objectIds()), 0)
invoice_line._setVariationBaseCategoryList(['hd_size', 'cpu_freq'])
@@ -730,7 +729,7 @@
base_id = 'movement'
invoice_line.updateCellRange(base_id)
cell_key_list = list(invoice_line.getCellKeyList(base_id = base_id))
-
+
# this is probably not the easiest way to create cells ...
price = 10
quantity = 5
@@ -741,23 +740,23 @@
price = price, quantity = quantity,
predicate_category_list = cell_key,
variation_category_list = cell_key)
-
+
# getTotalPrice uses mysql, so we must make sure the invoice is cataloged
# to have correct results
invoice_line.getParentValue().recursiveImmediateReindexObject()
self.assertEqual(invoice_line.getTotalPrice(), 100)
self.assertEqual(invoice_line.getTotalQuantity(), 10)
-
+
# then we must have 2 cells inside our line
self.assertEqual(len(invoice_line.objectIds()), 2)
def stepCreateMultiLineInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ create an invoice with varianted products
+ """ create an invoice with varianted products
The invoice is from `vendor` to `client_fr`, so the cell defined in
This invoice containts two lines :
- 10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price is 100
+ 10 notebook * 10 EUR, so total price is 100
(matched by product_notebook_region_france_cell)
- 10 barebone * 100 EUR, so total price is 1000
+ 10 barebone * 100 EUR, so total price is 1000
(matched by product_notebook_region_france_cell)
total price for the invoice is 100 + 1000
"""
@@ -766,7 +765,7 @@
product_notebook = sequence.get('product_notebook')
product_barebone = sequence.get('product_barebone')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
-
+
multi_line_invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = 'multi_line_invoice',
portal_type = self.invoice_portal_type,
@@ -778,7 +777,7 @@
destination_section = client.getRelativeUrl(),
created_by_builder = 1,
)
-
+
notebook_line = multi_line_invoice.newContent(
portal_type = self.invoice_line_portal_type,
id = 'notebook_line',
@@ -795,13 +794,13 @@
self.assertEqual( 10*10 + 10*100,
notebook_line.getTotalPrice() + barebone_line.getTotalPrice())
-
+
sequence.edit(
multi_line_invoice = multi_line_invoice,
invoice = multi_line_invoice,
invoice_lines = [notebook_line, barebone_line],
)
-
+
def stepCheckAddPredicate(self, sequence, **kw) :
invoice_transaction_rule = sequence.get('invoice_transaction_rule')
# next, we add a predicate to see if it is still okay (3x2 cells)
@@ -846,14 +845,14 @@
cell_list = invoice_transaction_rule.contentValues(
filter = {'portal_type':self.accounting_rule_cell_portal_type})
self.assertEqual(len(cell_list), 4)
-
+
def stepCreateDummyInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" Create a dummy invoice for temp movements """
invoice = self.getAccountingModule().newContent(
id = "dummy_invoice",
)
sequence.edit(invoice = invoice)
-
+
def stepCreateMatchableInvoiceMovements(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" Create a temp movement that will be matched by the
default_invoice_transaction_rule """
@@ -876,7 +875,7 @@
product_barebone_region_france_movement =
product_barebone_region_france_movement ,
)
-
+
def stepCheckMatchableInvoiceMovements(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" Check that we have a matching cell for the movement """
invoice_transaction_rule = sequence.get("invoice_transaction_rule")
@@ -884,7 +883,7 @@
'product_barebone_region_france_movement')
product_notebook_region_france_movement = sequence.get(
'product_notebook_region_france_movement')
-
+
# Make sure acquisition is working for destination_region
self.assertEqual(
product_barebone_region_france_movement.getDestinationRegion(),
@@ -892,19 +891,19 @@
self.assertEqual(
product_notebook_region_france_movement.getDestinationRegion(),
'region/europe/west/france')
-
+
# Make sure category is working for resource
self.assertEqual(product_barebone_region_france_movement.getProductLine(),
'storever/barebone')
self.assertEqual(product_notebook_region_france_movement.getProductLine(),
'storever/notebook')
-
- # check the predicates
+
+ # check the predicates
predicate_product_notebook = sequence.get("predicate_product_notebook")
predicate_product_barebone = sequence.get("predicate_product_barebone")
predicate_region_france = sequence.get("predicate_region_france")
predicate_region_africa = sequence.get("predicate_region_africa")
-
+
self.assert_(not predicate_region_africa.test(
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_( predicate_region_france.test(
@@ -913,7 +912,7 @@
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_( predicate_product_barebone.test(
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
-
+
self.assert_(not predicate_region_africa.test(
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_( predicate_region_france.test(
@@ -922,7 +921,7 @@
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_( predicate_product_notebook.test(
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
-
+
# check the cells
product_notebook_region_france_cell = sequence.get(
'product_notebook_region_france_cell')
@@ -940,7 +939,7 @@
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_(not product_barebone_region_africa_cell.test(
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
-
+
self.assert_( product_notebook_region_france_cell.test(
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_(not product_barebone_region_france_cell.test(
@@ -949,7 +948,7 @@
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
self.assert_(not product_barebone_region_africa_cell.test(
product_notebook_region_france_movement ))
-
+
# finally check the matching cell is the good one
self.assertEquals(product_notebook_region_france_cell,
invoice_transaction_rule._getMatchingCell(
@@ -957,7 +956,7 @@
self.assertEqual(product_barebone_region_france_cell,
invoice_transaction_rule._getMatchingCell(
product_barebone_region_france_movement ))
-
+
def stepCreateNotMatchableInvoiceMovements(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" create a temp movement that not any cell could match. """
from Products.ERP5Type.Document import newTempMovement
@@ -993,14 +992,14 @@
self.tic() # make sure message queue is empty
self.getSimulationTool().deleteContent(
list(self.getSimulationTool().objectIds()))
-
+
def stepClearAccountingModule(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" clear the content of accounting module """
self.tic() # make sure message queue is empty
# delete
self.getAccountingModule().deleteContent(
list(self.getAccountingModule().objectIds()))
-
+
def stepCheckFirstRuleIsApplied(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" check every level of the simulation """
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
@@ -1011,10 +1010,10 @@
currency = sequence.get('currency')
invoice_transaction_rule_cell = sequence.get(
'invoice_transaction_rule_cell')
-
+
# content of the simulation tool is a list of invoice rules
applied_rule_list = self.getSimulationTool().contentValues()
-
+
self.assertEqual(len(applied_rule_list), 1)
applied_rule = applied_rule_list[0]
self.assertEqual( applied_rule.getPortalType(),
@@ -1023,7 +1022,7 @@
'portal_rules/default_invoice_rule')
self.assertEqual( applied_rule.getCausality(),
invoice.getRelativeUrl())
-
+
# inside the rule there are simulation movements
simulation_movement_list = applied_rule.contentValues()
# the first one is a mirror of the movement in the invoice line
@@ -1036,10 +1035,10 @@
if simulation_movement.getOrderValue().getPortalType() == \
self.invoice_line_portal_type :
invoice_line_simulation_movement_list.append(simulation_movement)
-
+
self.assertEqual( len(invoice_line_simulation_movement_list), 1)
simulation_movement = invoice_line_simulation_movement_list[0]
-
+
self.assertEqual( simulation_movement.getPortalType(),
self.simulation_movement_portal_type)
self.assertEqual( invoice_line.getResource(),
@@ -1058,21 +1057,21 @@
simulation_movement.getSource())
self.assertEqual( invoice_line.getDestination(),
simulation_movement.getDestination())
-
+
# inside this movement there are applied rules which specialize
# invoice_transaction_rule and trade_model_rule...
applied_rule_list = simulation_movement.contentValues()
self.assertEquals( len(applied_rule_list), 2)
# ...but only invoice_transaction_rule is interesting
- applied_rule = [applied_rule for applied_rule in applied_rule_list if
- applied_rule.getSpecialiseValue().getPortalType() ==
+ applied_rule = [applied_rule for applied_rule in applied_rule_list if
+ applied_rule.getSpecialiseValue().getPortalType() ==
'Invoice Transaction Rule'][0]
self.assertEquals( applied_rule.getPortalType(),
self.applied_rule_portal_type)
self.assertEquals( applied_rule.getSpecialise(),
invoice_transaction_rule.getRelativeUrl())
-
- # and in this applied rule, we got simulation movements,
+
+ # and in this applied rule, we got simulation movements,
# based on those inside product_notebook_region_france_cell
simulation_movement_list = applied_rule.contentValues()
self.assertEqual( len(simulation_movement_list), 3)
@@ -1098,12 +1097,12 @@
self.assert_(len(rule_movement_found.keys()), 3)
sequence.edit( simulation_movement_list = simulation_movement_list )
-
+
def stepCollectSimulationMovements(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" put some simulation movements in sequence for later checkings """
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
invoice_line = sequence.get('invoice_line')
-
+
applied_rule_list = self.getSimulationTool().contentValues()
self.assertEquals(len(applied_rule_list), 1)
simulation_movement_list = []
@@ -1111,7 +1110,7 @@
simulation_movement_resources = {}
simulation_movement_paths = {}
simulation_movement_section_paths = {}
-
+
applied_rule = applied_rule_list[0]
for invoice_simulation_movement in applied_rule.objectValues() :
for invoice_transaction_applied_rule in \
@@ -1150,7 +1149,7 @@
'simulation_movement_paths')
simulation_movement_section_paths = sequence.get(
'simulation_movement_section_paths')
-
+
for simulation_movement in simulation_movement_list :
path = simulation_movement.getPath()
self.assertEquals(
@@ -1170,14 +1169,14 @@
simulation_movement.getDestinationSection()),
simulation_movement_section_paths[path]
)
-
+
def stepCheckPaymentRuleIsApplied(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" checks that a payment rule is applied for the total amount
of receivable """
# TODO
-
+
def stepPlanInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ put the invoice in the `planned` state, which will
+ """ put the invoice in the `planned` state, which will
start the simulation process. """
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
self.getPortal().portal_workflow.doActionFor(
@@ -1197,12 +1196,12 @@
skip_period_validation = 1
)
self.assertEquals(invoice.getSimulationState(), 'confirmed')
-
+
def stepCheckNoAccountingLinesBuiltYet(self, sequence, **kw) :
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
self.assertEquals(0, len(invoice.getMovementList(
portal_type=invoice.getPortalAccountingMovementTypeList())))
-
+
def stepStartInvoice(self, sequence, **kw) :
""" put the invoice in the `started` state, which starts the delivery
builder.
@@ -1217,7 +1216,7 @@
def stepCheckAccountingLinesCoherantWithSimulation(self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
+ """ checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
transaction """
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
vendor = sequence.get('vendor')
@@ -1232,7 +1231,7 @@
self.invoice_transaction_line_portal_type})
self.assertEquals( len(invoice_transaction_line_list),
len(simulation_movement_list))
-
+
simulation_movement_found = {}
for invoice_transaction_line in invoice_transaction_line_list :
self.assertEquals( invoice_transaction_line.getSourceSection(),
@@ -1255,21 +1254,21 @@
self.assertEquals(simulation_movement.getDelivery(),
invoice_transaction_line.getRelativeUrl())
self.assert_(len(simulation_movement_found.keys()), 3)
-
-
+
+
def stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice(
self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ Checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
+ """ Checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
transaction and that all movement are correctly aggregated.
The price of the invoice was 100, it should result in the following
accounting layout :
-
+
=============== ======= =======
account Debit Credit
=============== ======= =======
income 100
collected_vat 19.60
- receivable 119.60
+ receivable 119.60
=============== ======= =======
"""
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
@@ -1277,11 +1276,11 @@
client = sequence.get('client')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
invoice_lines = sequence.get('invoice_lines')
-
+
invoice_transaction_line_list = invoice.contentValues(
filter = {'portal_type': self.invoice_transaction_line_portal_type})
self.assertEquals(len(invoice_transaction_line_list), 3)
-
+
accounting_lines_layout = {
'income' : (0, 100),
'collected_vat' : (0, 19.60),
@@ -1299,21 +1298,21 @@
self.assertNotEquals(
len(invoice_transaction_line.getDeliveryRelatedValueList(
portal_type='Simulation Movement')), 0)
-
+
def stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForMultiLineInvoice(
self, sequence, **kw) :
- """ Checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
+ """ Checks that accounting lines are created on the sale invoice
transaction and that all movement are correctly aggregated.
The price of the invoice was 1100, it should result in the following
accounting layout :
-
+
=============== ======= =======
account Debit Credit
=============== ======= =======
income 100
income_barebone 1000
collected_vat 215.60
- receivable 1315.60
+ receivable 1315.60
=============== ======= =======
"""
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
@@ -1321,18 +1320,18 @@
client = sequence.get('client')
currency = sequence.get('currency')
invoice_lines = sequence.get('invoice_lines')
-
+
invoice_transaction_line_list = invoice.contentValues(
filter = {'portal_type': self.invoice_transaction_line_portal_type})
self.assertEquals(len(invoice_transaction_line_list), 4)
-
+
accounting_lines_layout = {
'income' : (0, 100),
'income_barebone' : (0, 1000),
'collected_vat' : (0, 215.60),
'receivable' : (1315.60, 0),
}
-
+
for invoice_transaction_line in invoice_transaction_line_list :
debit, credit = accounting_lines_layout[
invoice_transaction_line.getSourceId()]
@@ -1356,7 +1355,7 @@
transaction_dict[accounting_line.getId()] = \
accounting_line.getTotalQuantity()
accounting_lines_dict[transaction.getId()] = transaction_dict
-
+
# reindex the simulation for testing purposes
self.getSimulationTool().recursiveReindexObject()
self.tic()
@@ -1367,11 +1366,11 @@
# TODO: conflict with pay_sheet_transaction_builder must be tested too
delivery_tool.pay_sheet_transaction_builder.build()
self.tic()
-
+
# nothing should have changed
self.assertEquals(accounting_transaction_count,
len(self.getAccountingModule().objectIds()))
-
+
for transaction in self.getAccountingModule().objectValues() :
transaction_dict = accounting_lines_dict[transaction.getId()]
for accounting_line in transaction.objectValues() :
@@ -1380,7 +1379,7 @@
self.assertEquals(
transaction_dict[accounting_line.getId()],
accounting_line.getTotalQuantity())
-
+
def stepCheckInvoiceSimulation(self, sequence=None, \
sequence_list=None, **kw):
invoice = sequence.get('invoice')
@@ -1461,7 +1460,7 @@
10,
simulation_movement.getPrice()
)
-
+
def test_01_HasEverything(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" check necessary tools and modules are present. """
if not run:
@@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@
def test_02_UpdateInvoiceTransactionRuleMatrix(self, quiet=QUIET,
run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" test edition of matrix and rule.
- Try to update the matrix after adding some predicates,
+ Try to update the matrix after adding some predicates,
and check if all objects were created
"""
if not run:
@@ -1493,7 +1492,7 @@
message = 'Test Update Invoice Transaction Rule Matrix'
ZopeTestCase._print('\n%s ' % message)
LOG('Testing... ', INFO, message)
-
+
self.playSequence("""
stepCreateInvoiceTransactionRule
stepUpdateInvoiceTransactionRuleMatrix
@@ -1516,7 +1515,7 @@
message = 'Test Invoice Transaction Rule getMatchingCell '
ZopeTestCase._print('\n%s ' % message)
LOG('Testing... ', INFO, message)
-
+
self.playSequence("""
stepCreateAccounts
stepCreateEntities
@@ -1533,7 +1532,7 @@
stepCreateNotMatchableInvoiceMovements
stepCheckNotMatchableInvoiceMovements
""", quiet=quiet)
-
+
def test_04_SimpleInvoice(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Simple Invoice.
Try to expand an invoice containing only one simple Invoice Line.
@@ -1561,7 +1560,7 @@
stepCreateSimpleInvoice
stepPlanInvoice
stepTic
- stepCheckFirstRuleIsApplied
+ stepCheckFirstRuleIsApplied
stepCheckPaymentRuleIsApplied
stepConfirmInvoice
stepTic
@@ -1569,6 +1568,7 @@
stepStartInvoice
stepTic
stepCheckAccountingLinesCoherantWithSimulation
+ stepPdb
""", quiet=quiet )
def test_04b_SimpleInvoiceConfirm(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
+
def test_04c_SimpleInvoiceTwoLines(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Simple Invoice, 2 lines.
Same test as SimpleInvoice but use 2 lines of quantity 5 instead of
@@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
+
def test_04d_SimpleInvoiceTwoCells(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Simple Invoice, 2 cells.
Same test as SimpleInvoice but use 2 cells of quantity 5 instead of
@@ -1670,8 +1670,8 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
- # next 5 tests will check update of applied rules.
+
+ # next 5 tests will check update of applied rules.
def test_05a_SimpleInvoiceReExpandAddLine(self, quiet=QUIET,
run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Add a new line then updateAppliedRule.
@@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
+
def test_05b_SimpleInvoiceReExpandEditLine(self, quiet=QUIET,
run = RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Tests that editing a line updates simulation correctly """
@@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
+
def test_05d_SimpleInvoiceReExpandCreateCell(self, quiet=QUIET,
run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Tests that replacing a line by cells updates simulation correctly """
@@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForSimpleInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet)
-
+
def test_05e_SimpleInvoiceExpandManyTimes(
self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Tests that updating an applied rule many times doesn't break the
@@ -1841,7 +1841,7 @@
stepTic
stepClearSimulation
stepClearAccountingModule
- stepCreateSimpleInvoice
+ stepCreateSimpleInvoice
stepPlanInvoice
stepTic """ +
("""
@@ -1895,7 +1895,7 @@
stepCheckAccountingLinesCreatedForMultiLineInvoice
stepRebuildAndCheckNothingIsCreated
""", quiet=quiet )
-
+
def TODO_test_07_PaymentRuleForInvoice(self, quiet=QUIET, run=RUN_ALL_TESTS):
""" Payment Rule.
checks the payment rule is applied on invoice simulation
@@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@
# date from trade condition
# quantity from sum of receivable movement
# link to sale invoice
-
+
def test_planning_invoice_creates_simulation(self, quiet=QUIET):
# http://mail.nexedi.com/pipermail/erp5-dev/2008-June/001969.html
self.playSequence("""
More information about the Erp5-report
mailing list