[Erp5-dev] Deeper containers consumption
Łukasz Nowak
lukasz.nowak at ventis.com.pl
Wed Jun 11 15:58:30 CEST 2008
Hello,
On 2008-06-06, 14:18:17
Yoshinori Okuji <yo at nexedi.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2008 11:42:59 Łukasz Nowak wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While packing Sale Packing Lists Resources' related to Container on
> > top level are consumed. But no there is no consumption of Resources'
> > related to lower level containers.
> >
> > Eg:
> >
> > SPL-1
> > Container 1 resource: A
> > Container 2 resource: B
> > Container 1 in 2 resource: C
> >
> > resource A, resource B - there are movements
> > resource C - no movements.
> >
> > Is it wanted behaviour? Is it possible to configure it?
>
> I hardly believe that this is desired. Someone must investigate
> Container handling thouroughly.
Got something.
In movement table there is movement for both resources, which looks
like:
+-------+-----------------+------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+---------------------+---------------------+
| uid | explanation_uid | source_uid | destination_uid | resource_uid | quantity | start_date | stop_date |
+-------+-----------------+------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+---------------------+---------------------+
| 12901 | 12903 | NULL | NULL | 8395 | 1 | NULL | NULL |
| 12902 | 12903 | 5430 | 6520 | 8396 | 1 | 2008-06-09 00:00:00 | 2008-06-09 00:00:00 |
+-------+-----------------+------------+-----------------+--------------+----------+---------------------+---------------------+
resource with uid 8396 is higher level (like resource A), resource with
uid 8396 is on lower level (like resource B).
Am I wrong is it associated with acquisition of categories? Because
invking getSource[Uid] on 8396 returns proper value, and on 8395
returns None.
Trying out more :)
Regards,
Luke
--
Łukasz Nowak R&D Ventis http://www.ventis.com.pl/
tel: +48 32 768 16 85 fax: +48 32 392 10 61
``Use the Source, Luke...'' I am only craftsman.
More information about the Erp5-dev
mailing list